Linear vs Jira vs ClickUp: which project tracker is cheapest at 10 seats?

Run the math at 10 seats and ClickUp wins on paper — its Unlimited plan starts near $7/user, Business around $12. Jira's Standard tier lands close behind at roughly $8.60/user on annual billing. Linear costs the most per seat, $10 to $16 depending on tier, and doesn't apologize for it.

That gap is the whole story, honestly. Linear isn't trying to be the cheapest — it's trying to be the fastest, keyboard-driven, opinionated issue tracker for engineering teams who find Jira's flexibility exhausting rather than empowering. Teams that switch to Linear from Jira almost never go back, and teams that never had the Jira-fatigue problem in the first place often don't see what the extra few dollars a seat buys them.

ClickUp's number looks great until you read the fine print: ClickUp Brain, the AI layer, is a **separate $9/user add-on**, not included in Unlimited or Business. A 10-person team that wants the AI features is paying $12 + $9 = $21/seat — more than Linear's top tier, for a tool that's trying to be a project manager, a doc editor, a chat app, and a whiteboard all at once.

| Tool | List price/seat | With AI included? |
|---|---|---|
| ClickUp Business | ~$12/mo | no — Brain is +$9/mo |
| Jira Standard | ~$8.60/mo | AI credits vary by tier |
| Linear Business | ~$16/mo | yes, at the top tier |

For a 10-person engineering team specifically: Jira if you're already deep in the Atlassian ecosystem (Confluence, Bitbucket) and don't want a second tool to administer. Linear if velocity and a clean interface matter more than raw feature count. ClickUp if the team genuinely wants one app for everything — just budget for the AI add-on before you compare it to the other two, because the sticker price alone is misleading.